|Posted:||January 12, 2021 12:41 PM|
|From:||Representative Russ Diamond|
|To:||All House members|
|Subject:||Reforming the Sales Tax; Reducing Rate from 6% to 1.9%|
|In the near future I will be introducing a package of bills to reform and modernize Pennsylvania’s Sales and Use Tax (SUT). This effort is aimed at simplifying the system, reducing retailer confusion, recognizing the realities of our economy, and making our Commonwealth more competitive with surrounding states. This plan is intentionally revenue neutral as compared to the fiscal year prior to its effective date.
In short, my legislation will remove all exceptions and exclusions to the SUT, reduce the statewide SUT rate from 6 percent to 1.9 percent, reduce Philadelphia’s total additional SUT rate from 2 percent to 0.64 percent, reduce Allegheny County’s local SUT from 1 percent to 0.32 percent, and reduce the PTAF sales tax revenue transfer rate from 0.947 percent to 0.30 percent.
Under this legislation, Pennsylvania’s SUT rate of 1.9 percent will be significantly lower than rates in neighboring states. Those current combined state and local rates are as follows: New Jersey – 6.60 percent, New York – 8.52 percent, Ohio – 7.23 percent, West Virginia – 6.50 percent, and Maryland – 6 percent. The new lower SUT rate will also help reduce “border bleed” to Delaware, which has no sales tax (although it does have a gross receipts tax which all businesses pay, ranging from .0945 to .7468 percent).
When the SUT was first enacted in 1954, services accounted for less than 40 percent of the overall economy. Today, services account for approximately 70 percent of Pennsylvania’s economy. This reality, along with a growing list of SUT exemptions and the impacts of online transactions, has served to make the SUT a less predictable and stable revenue source for the Commonwealth.
Upon enactment of this legislation the SUT will remain an assessment on the end user, as goods and services purchased for resale will continue to qualify for SUT exemptions.
It bears mentioning that Alabama, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and South Dakota all tax groceries at their full statewide sales tax rates. Arkansas, Illinois, Missouri, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and West Virginia also tax groceries, but at lower rates than other goods. Additionally, in Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina, and South Carolina, groceries are fully subject to local sales tax.
Of the 45 states that assess a state sales tax, clothing is taxable in 37, as well as in the District of Columbia. Although the taxation of services varies widely across the nation, Delaware, Hawaii, New Mexico, South Dakota, Washington and West Virginia tax services broadly.
It’s time we put an end to the sales tax jigsaw puzzle that pits Pennsylvanian against Pennsylvanian and adopt instead a modernized level playing field which acknowledges the realities of our economy and the fact that we’re all in this together. I respectfully ask for your co-sponsorship of these three pieces of legislation.
Introduced as HB307
Introduced as HB297
Description: The second bill (former HB 2253) amends the Second Class County Code by reducing the Allegheny County local SUT from 1 percent to 0.32 percent.
Introduced as HB305
Description: The third bill (former HB 2254) amends the PA Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority (PICA) by reducing the rate for the additional Philadelphia SUT from 1 percent to 0.32 percent.