or statement under subsection (a) may be rebutted by a
preponderance of the evidence if, based on the totality of
the circumstances, all of the following apply:
(i) The confession or statement was voluntarily
given by the defendant.
(ii) The confession or statement would have
otherwise been provided to the law enforcement officer if
the confession or statement had not been obtained through
deceptive practices.
(2) The burden of rebutting the presumption of
inadmissibility of a confession or statement under subsection
(a) shall be on the Commonwealth.
(c) Appeals.--The Commonwealth must rebut the presumption of
inadmissibility of a confession or statement under subsection
(a) during a preliminary hearing and before trial. Failure to
seek a rebuttal under this subsection shall bar the issue from
being raised on appeal.
(d) Definitions.--As used in this section, the following
words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this
subsection unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
" Custodial interrogation." An interrogation during which:
(1) a reasonable person would believe to be in custody;
and
(2) a question is asked that is reasonably likely to
elicit an incriminating response.
" Deception." The knowing communication of a false fact about
evidence or an unauthorized statement regarding leniency made to
a respondent by a law enforcement officer for the purpose of
eliciting an incriminating response from the respondent.
"Law enforcement officer." As defined in section 5950(d)
20210HB1860PN2106 - 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30