
exercise reasonable care was a proximate cause of the
harm complained of by the plaintiff.
(ii) For purposes of this paragraph, a product
seller may not be considered to have failed to exercise
reasonable care with respect to the product based upon an
alleged failure to inspect a product where there was no
reasonable opportunity to inspect the product in a manner
that, in the exercise of reasonable care, would have
revealed the aspect of the product that allegedly caused
the harm complained of by the plaintiff.
(2) The product seller made an express warranty
applicable to the product that allegedly caused the harm
complained of by the plaintiff independent of an express
warranty made by a manufacturer as to the same product, the
product failed to conform to the product seller's express
warranty and the failure of the product to conform to the
product seller's express warranty caused the harm complained
of by the plaintiff.
(3) The product seller, before placing the product in
the stream of commerce, exercised significant control over
the design, manufacture, packaging or labeling of the product
related to the alleged defect in the product that caused the
harm complained of by the plaintiff.
(4) The product seller, before placing the product in
the stream of commerce, knew or reasonably should have known
of the defect in the product that caused the harm complained
of by the plaintiff or the product seller was in possession
of facts from which a reasonable person would conclude that
the product seller had or should have had knowledge of the
alleged defect in the product that caused the harm complained
20190SB0516PN0547 - 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30