See other bills
under the
same topic
                                 SENATE AMENDED
        PRIOR PRINTER'S NO. 1672                      PRINTER'S NO. 3192

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA


HOUSE BILL

No. 1329 Session of 2007


        INTRODUCED BY KESSLER, FREEMAN, SAYLOR, BRENNAN, CARROLL,
           CREIGHTON, CURRY, EVERETT, FLECK, GALLOWAY, GERBER, GRUCELA,
           HARPER, HENNESSEY, KING, KORTZ, KULA, LEACH, LENTZ,
           LONGIETTI, MACKERETH, MELIO, MOYER, O'NEILL, SEIP, K. SMITH,
           WATSON, MENSCH AND CALTAGIRONE, MAY 24, 2007

        SENATOR REGOLA, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, IN SENATE, AS AMENDED,
           FEBRUARY 6, 2008

                                     AN ACT

     1  Amending the act of July 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), entitled,
     2     as amended, "An act to empower cities of the second class A,
     3     and third class, boroughs, incorporated towns, townships of
     4     the first and second classes including those within a county
     5     of the second class and counties of the second through eighth
     6     classes, individually or jointly, to plan their development
     7     and to govern the same by zoning, subdivision and land
     8     development ordinances, planned residential development and
     9     other ordinances, by official maps, by the reservation of
    10     certain land for future public purpose and by the acquisition
    11     of such land; to promote the conservation of energy through
    12     the use of planning practices and to promote the effective
    13     utilization of renewable energy sources; providing for the
    14     establishment of planning commissions, planning departments,
    15     planning committees and zoning hearing boards, authorizing
    16     them to charge fees, make inspections and hold public
    17     hearings; providing for mediation; providing for transferable
    18     development rights; providing for appropriations, appeals to
    19     courts and penalties for violations; and repealing acts and
    20     parts of acts," PROVIDING FOR OPTIONAL NOTICE OF ORDINANCE OR  <--
    21     DECISION AND PROCEDURAL VALIDITY CHALLENGES; further
    22     providing FOR ORDINANCE PROVISIONS AND for jurisdiction of     <--
    23     the zoning hearing board and the court of common pleas in
    24     challenges to the validity of an ordinance for procedural
    25     defects in the process of enactment; AND PROVIDING FOR TIME    <--
    26     FOR APPEAL AND PROCEDURAL DEFECTS OF DECISIONS.

    27     The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania


     1  hereby enacts as follows:
     2     Section 1.  Section 909.1(a) of the act of July 31, 1968       <--
     3  (P.L.805, No.247), known as the Pennsylvania Municipalities
     4  Planning Code, reenacted and amended December 21, 1988
     5  (P.L.1329, No.170), is amended to read:
     6     SECTION 1.  THE ACT OF JULY 31, 1968 (P.L.805, NO.247), KNOWN  <--
     7  AS THE PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPALITIES PLANNING CODE, REENACTED AND
     8  AMENDED DECEMBER 21, 1988 (P.L.1329, NO.170), IS AMENDED BY
     9  ADDING A SECTION TO READ:
    10     SECTION 108.  OPTIONAL NOTICE OF ORDINANCE OR DECISION;
    11  PROCEDURAL VALIDITY CHALLENGES.--(A)  IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS
    12  SECTION TO ALLOW OPTIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE OF MUNICIPAL ACTION IN
    13  ORDER TO PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CHALLENGE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH
    14  SECTION 1002-A(B) OR SECTION 1002.1-A, THE VALIDITY OF AN
    15  ORDINANCE OR DECISION ON THE BASIS THAT A DEFECT IN PROCEDURE
    16  RESULTED IN A DEPRIVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND TO
    17  ESTABLISH A PERIOD OF LIMITATIONS FOR RAISING SUCH CHALLENGES.
    18     (B)  NOTICE THAT MUNICIPAL ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN TO ADOPT AN
    19  ORDINANCE OR ENTER A DECISION, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE
    20  MUNICIPAL ACTION WAS TAKEN BEFORE OR AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF
    21  THIS SECTION, MAY BE PROVIDED THROUGH PUBLICATION, AT ANY TIME,
    22  ONCE EACH WEEK FOR TWO SUCCESSIVE WEEKS IN A NEWSPAPER OF
    23  GENERAL CIRCULATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY BY THE FOLLOWING:
    24         (1)  THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE MUNICIPALITY.
    25         (2)  IN THE CASE OF AN ORDINANCE, ANY RESIDENT OR
    26     LANDOWNER IN THE MUNICIPALITY.
    27         (3)  IN THE CASE OF A DECISION, THE APPLICANT REQUESTING
    28     THE DECISION OR THE LANDOWNER OR SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST OF THE
    29     PROPERTY SUBJECT TO OR AFFECTED BY THE DECISION.
    30     (C)  EACH NOTICE SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING:
    20070H1329B3192                  - 2 -     

     1         (1)  IF THE NOTICE RELATES TO AN ORDINANCE:
     2             (I)  THE MUNICIPALITY'S ORDINANCE NUMBER.
     3             (II)  A BRIEF STATEMENT OF THE GENERAL CONTENT OF THE
     4         ORDINANCE.
     5             (III)  THE ADDRESS OF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING WHERE
     6         THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE MAY BE REVIEWED BY MEMBERS
     7         OF THE PUBLIC.
     8         (2)  IF THE NOTICE RELATES TO A DECISION:
     9             (I)  THE NAME OF THE APPLICANT OR OWNER OF THE
    10         SUBJECT PROPERTY.
    11             (II)  THE STREET ADDRESS OR LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT
    12         PROPERTY.
    13             (III)  THE FILE NUMBER OR DOCKET NUMBER OF THE
    14         DECISION.
    15             (IV)  A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE NATURE OF THE
    16         DECISION.
    17             (V)  THE DATE UPON WHICH THE DECISION WAS ISSUED.
    18             (VI)  THE ADDRESS OF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING WHERE THE
    19         FULL TEXT OF THE DECISION MAY BE REVIEWED BY MEMBERS OF
    20         THE PUBLIC.
    21         (3)  IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF PARAGRAPHS (1)
    22     AND (2), THE PUBLICATION OF EACH NOTICE AUTHORIZED BY THE
    23     SECTION SHALL CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT THE PUBLICATION IS
    24     INTENDED TO PROVIDE NOTIFICATION OF AN ORDINANCE OR DECISION
    25     AND THAT ANY PERSON CLAIMING A RIGHT TO CHALLENGE THE
    26     VALIDITY OF THE ORDINANCE OR DECISION MUST BRING A LEGAL
    27     ACTION WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE PUBLICATION OF THE SECOND
    28     NOTICE.
    29         (4)  THE PERSON PROVIDING NOTICE AS AUTHORIZED BY THIS
    30     SECTION SHALL PROVIDE PROOF OF PUBLICATION TO THE
    20070H1329B3192                  - 3 -     

     1     MUNICIPALITY ADOPTING THE ORDINANCE OR DECISION FOR RETENTION
     2     WITH MUNICIPAL RECORDS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS PARAGRAPH
     3     SHALL NOT INVALIDATE ANY NOTICE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
     4     THIS SECTION OR THE APPLICABILITY OF THE PERIOD OF LIMITATION
     5     IN SUBSECTION (D).
     6     (D)  NOTWITHSTANDING THIS OR ANY OTHER ACT, IN ORDER TO
     7  PROVIDE CERTAINTY OF THE VALIDITY OF AN ORDINANCE OR DECISION,
     8  ANY APPEAL OR ACTION CONTESTING THE VALIDITY OF AN ORDINANCE
     9  BASED ON A PROCEDURAL DEFECT IN THE PROCESS OF ENACTMENT OR THE
    10  VALIDITY OF A DECISION BASED ON A PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE
    11  DEFECT SHALL BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, AS UNTIMELY IF NOT
    12  FILED WITHIN THE 30TH DAY FOLLOWING THE SECOND PUBLICATION OF
    13  THE NOTICE AUTHORIZED IN THIS SECTION.
    14     (E)  ANY APPEAL OR ACTION FILED WITHIN THE 30-DAY PERIOD
    15  REFERRED TO IN SUBSECTION (D) SHALL BE TAKEN TO THE COURT OF
    16  COMMON PLEAS AND SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND
    17  SUBJECT TO THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN 42 PA.C.S. § 5571.1
    18  (RELATING TO APPEALS FROM ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, MAPS, ETC.)
    19  IN THE CASE OF CHALLENGES TO ORDINANCES OR SECTION 1002.1-A IN
    20  THE CASE OF CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS.
    21     (F)  WHERE NO APPEAL OR ACTION CONTESTING THE PROCEDURAL
    22  VALIDITY OF AN ORDINANCE OR THE PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE
    23  VALIDITY OF A DECISION IS FILED WITHIN THE PERIOD SET FORTH IN
    24  SUBSECTION (D), THE ORDINANCE OR DECISION SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE
    25  REAFFIRMED AND REISSUED ON THE DATE OF THE SECOND PUBLICATION OF
    26  THE OPTIONAL NOTICE PERMITTED UNDER THIS SECTION.
    27     (G)  AN APPEAL SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM THE TIME LIMITATION IN
    28  SUBSECTION (D) ONLY IF THE PARTY BRINGING THE APPEAL ESTABLISHES
    29  THAT THE APPLICATION OF THE TIME LIMITATION IN SUBSECTION (D)
    30  WOULD RESULT IN AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS.
    20070H1329B3192                  - 4 -     

     1     (H)  NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO ABROGATE,
     2  REPEAL, EXTEND OR OTHERWISE MODIFY THE TIME FOR APPEAL AS SET
     3  FORTH IN SECTION 1002-A WHERE THE APPELLANT WAS A PARTY TO
     4  PROCEEDINGS PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF A DECISION OR OTHERWISE HAD AN
     5  ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY TO BRING A TIMELY ACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH
     6  SECTION 1002-A TO CONTEST THE PROCEDURAL VALIDITY OF AN
     7  ORDINANCE OR THE PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE VALIDITY OF A
     8  DECISION.
     9     SECTION 2.  SECTION 603(C) OF THE ACT, AMENDED JUNE 22, 2000
    10  (P.L.495, NO.68), IS AMENDED TO READ:
    11     SECTION 603.  ORDINANCE PROVISIONS.--* * *
    12     (C)  ZONING ORDINANCES MAY CONTAIN:
    13         (1)  PROVISIONS FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AND VARIANCES
    14     ADMINISTERED BY THE ZONING HEARING BOARD, WHICH PROVISIONS
    15     SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ACT;
    16         (2)  PROVISIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USES TO BE ALLOWED OR
    17     DENIED BY THE GOVERNING BODY [PURSUANT TO PUBLIC NOTICE AND
    18     HEARING AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE PLANNING AGENCY AND
    19     PURSUANT TO EXPRESS STANDARDS AND CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE
    20     ZONING ORDINANCES.] AFTER RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE PLANNING
    21     AGENCY AND HEARING, PURSUANT TO EXPRESS STANDARDS AND
    22     CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE. NOTICE OF
    23     HEARINGS ON CONDITIONAL USES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE
    24     WITH SECTION 908(1), AND NOTICE OF THE DECISION SHALL BE
    25     PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 908(10). IN ALLOWING A
    26     CONDITIONAL USE, THE GOVERNING BODY MAY ATTACH SUCH
    27     REASONABLE CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS, OTHER THAN THOSE
    28     RELATED TO OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION OR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, IN
    29     ADDITION TO THOSE EXPRESSED IN THE ORDINANCE, AS IT MAY DEEM
    30     NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE PURPOSES OF THIS ACT AND THE
    20070H1329B3192                  - 5 -     

     1     ZONING ORDINANCE;
     2         (2.2)  PROVISIONS FOR REGULATING TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT
     3     RIGHTS, ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS, INCLUDING PROVISIONS FOR THE
     4     PROTECTION OF PERSONS ACQUIRING THE SAME, IN ACCORDANCE WITH
     5     EXPRESS STANDARDS AND CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE ORDINANCE AND
     6     SECTION 619.1;
     7         (3)  PROVISIONS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF
     8     SUCH ORDINANCES;
     9         (4)  SUCH OTHER PROVISIONS AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO
    10     IMPLEMENT THE PURPOSES OF THIS ACT;
    11         (5)  PROVISIONS TO ENCOURAGE INNOVATION AND TO PROMOTE
    12     FLEXIBILITY, ECONOMY AND INGENUITY IN DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING
    13     SUBDIVISIONS AND LAND DEVELOPMENTS AS DEFINED IN THIS ACT;
    14         (6)  PROVISIONS AUTHORIZING INCREASES IN THE PERMISSIBLE
    15     DENSITY OF POPULATION OR INTENSITY OF A PARTICULAR USE BASED
    16     UPON EXPRESSED STANDARDS AND CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE ZONING
    17     ORDINANCE; AND
    18         (7)  PROVISIONS TO PROMOTE AND PRESERVE PRIME
    19     AGRICULTURAL LAND, ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS AND AREAS
    20     OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE.
    21     * * *
    22     SECTION 3.  SECTION 909.1(A) OF THE ACT IS AMENDED TO READ:
    23     Section 909.1.  Jurisdiction.--(a)  The zoning hearing board
    24  shall have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and render final
    25  adjudications in the following matters:
    26         (1)  Substantive challenges to the validity of any land
    27     use ordinance, except those brought before the governing body
    28     pursuant to sections 609.1 and 916.1(a)(2).
    29         [(2)  Challenges to the validity of a land use ordinance
    30     raising procedural questions or alleged defects in the
    20070H1329B3192                  - 6 -     

     1     process of enactment or adoption which challenges shall be
     2     raised by an appeal taken within 30 days after the effective
     3     date of said ordinance. Where the ordinance appealed from is
     4     the initial zoning ordinance of the municipality and a zoning
     5     hearing board has not been previously established, the appeal
     6     raising procedural questions shall be taken directly to
     7     court.]
     8         (3)  Appeals from the determination of the zoning
     9     officer, including, but not limited to, the granting or
    10     denial of any permit, or failure to act on the application
    11     therefor, the issuance of any cease and desist order or the
    12     registration or refusal to register any nonconforming use,
    13     structure or lot.
    14         (4)  Appeals from a determination by a municipal engineer
    15     or the zoning officer with reference to the administration of
    16     any flood plain or flood hazard ordinance or such provisions
    17     within a land use ordinance.
    18         (5)  Applications for variances from the terms of the
    19     zoning ordinance and flood hazard ordinance or such
    20     provisions within a land use ordinance, pursuant to section
    21     910.2.
    22         (6)  Applications for special exceptions under the zoning
    23     ordinance or flood plain or flood hazard ordinance or such
    24     provisions within a land use ordinance, pursuant to section
    25     912.1.
    26         (7)  Appeals from the determination of any officer or
    27     agency charged with the administration of any transfers of
    28     development rights or performance density provisions of the
    29     zoning ordinance.
    30         (8)  Appeals from the zoning officer's determination
    20070H1329B3192                  - 7 -     

     1     under section 916.2.
     2         (9)  Appeals from the determination of the zoning officer
     3     or municipal engineer in the administration of any land use
     4     ordinance or provision thereof with reference to
     5     sedimentation and erosion control and storm water management
     6     insofar as the same relate to development not involving
     7     Article V or VII applications.
     8     * * *
     9     Section 2 4.  Section 1002-A of the act is amended to read:    <--
    10     Section 1002-A.  Jurisdiction and Venue on Appeal; Time for
    11  Appeal; Procedural defects.--(a)  All appeals from all land use   <--
    12  decisions rendered pursuant to Article IX shall be taken to the
    13  court of common pleas of the judicial district wherein the land
    14  is located and shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the
    15  decision as provided in 42 Pa.C.S. § 5572 (relating to time of
    16  entry of order) or, in the case of a deemed decision, within 30
    17  days after the date upon which notice of said deemed decision is
    18  given as set forth in section 908(9) of this act. IT IS THE       <--
    19  EXPRESS INTENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY THAT, EXCEPT IN CASES IN
    20  WHICH AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS WOULD
    21  RESULT FROM ITS APPLICATION, THE 30-DAY LIMITATION IN THIS
    22  SECTION SHOULD BE APPLIED IN ALL APPEALS FROM DECISIONS.
    23     (b)  Challenges to the validity of a land use ordinance
    24  raising procedural questions or alleged defects in the process
    25  of enactment or adoption shall be raised by appeal taken
    26  directly to the court of common pleas of the judicial district
    27  in which the municipality adopting the ordinance is located in
    28  accordance with 42 Pa.C.S. § 5571.1 (relating to appeals from
    29  ordinances, resolutions, maps, etc.).
    30     SECTION 5.  THE ACT IS AMENDED BY ADDING A SECTION TO READ:    <--
    20070H1329B3192                  - 8 -     

     1     SECTION 1002.1-A.  TIME FOR APPEAL; PROCEDURAL DEFECTS OF
     2  DECISIONS.--(A)  THIS SECTION SHALL APPLY TO ALL APPEALS
     3  CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A LAND USE DECISION ON THE BASIS OF
     4  A DEFECT IN PROCEDURES PRESCRIBED BY STATUTE OR ORDINANCE.
     5     (B)  EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN SECTION 108, ALL APPEALS
     6  CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A DECISION SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF A
     7  DEFECT IN PROCEDURE SHALL BE FILED WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD
     8  PROVIDED IN SECTION 1002-A(A) UNLESS A PARTY ESTABLISHES EACH OF
     9  THE FOLLOWING:
    10         (1)  THAT THE PERSON FILING THE APPEAL HAD INSUFFICIENT
    11     ACTUAL OR CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF THE DECISION TO PERMIT
    12     FILING AN APPEAL WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD PROVIDED IN SECTION
    13     1002-A(A). NOTICE OF A HEARING PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF A
    14     DECISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 908(1), NOTICE OF A
    15     DECISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 908(10) OR NOTICE OF A
    16     DEEMED DECISION PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ACT SHALL
    17     ESTABLISH CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AS A MATTER OF LAW IN ANY
    18     APPEAL UNDER THIS SECTION.
    19         (2)  THAT BECAUSE OF THE INSUFFICIENT ACTUAL OR
    20     CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF THE DECISION, THE APPLICATION OF THE
    21     TIME LIMITATION IN SECTION 1002-A(A) WOULD RESULT IN AN
    22     IMPERMISSIBLE DEPRIVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
    23     (C)  APPEALS UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL ONLY BE PERMITTED BY AN
    24  AGGRIEVED PERSON WHO CAN ESTABLISH THAT RELIANCE ON THE VALIDITY
    25  OF THE CHALLENGED DECISION RESULTED OR COULD RESULT IN A USE OF
    26  PROPERTY THAT DIRECTLY AFFECTS SUCH PERSON'S SUBSTANTIVE
    27  PROPERTY RIGHTS.
    28     (D)  NO DECISION CHALLENGED IN AN APPEAL PURSUANT TO THIS
    29  SECTION SHALL BE DEEMED VOID FROM INCEPTION EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS:
    30         (1)  IN THE CASE OF AN APPEAL BROUGHT WITHIN THE TIME
    20070H1329B3192                  - 9 -     

     1     PERIOD PROVIDED IN SECTION 1002-A(A), THE PARTY ALLEGING THE
     2     DEFECT MUST MEET THE BURDEN OF PROVING THAT THERE WAS A
     3     FAILURE TO STRICTLY COMPLY WITH PROCEDURE.
     4         (2)  IN THE CASE OF AN APPEAL EXEMPT FROM THE TIME PERIOD
     5     PROVIDED IN SECTION 1002-A(A) OR BROUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION
     6     108, THE PARTY ALLEGING THE DEFECT MUST MEET THE BURDEN OF
     7     PROVING THAT BECAUSE OF THE ALLEGED DEFECT IN PROCEDURE
     8     ALONE:
     9             (I)  THE PUBLIC WAS DENIED NOTICE SUFFICIENT TO
    10         PERMIT PARTICIPATION IN THE PROCEEDINGS PRIOR TO THE
    11         ENTRY OF THE DECISION TO THE EXTENT SUCH PARTICIPATION
    12         WAS AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE OR ORDINANCE; OR
    13             (II)  THOSE WHOSE SUBSTANTIVE PROPERTY RIGHTS WERE OR
    14         COULD BE DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY THE ENTRY OF THE DECISION
    15         WERE DENIED AN OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN PROCEEDINGS
    16         PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF THE DECISION.
    17     (E)  SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH NOTICE OF A HEARING REQUIRED
    18  PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF A DECISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
    19  908(1) SHALL ESTABLISH NOTICE ADEQUATE TO PERMIT PUBLIC
    20  PARTICIPATION AS A MATTER OF LAW IN ANY APPEAL UNDER THIS
    21  SECTION.
    22     (F)  AN ADJUDICATION THAT A DECISION IS VOID FROM INCEPTION
    23  SHALL NOT AFFECT ANY PREVIOUSLY ACQUIRED RIGHTS OF PROPERTY
    24  OWNERS WHO HAVE EXERCISED GOOD FAITH RELIANCE ON THE VALIDITY OF
    25  THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE DETERMINATION.
    26     SECTION 6.  THE ADDITION OF SECTIONS 108 AND 1002.1-A OF THE
    27  ACT SHALL APPLY BEGINNING ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF AN AMENDMENT
    28  TO 42 PA.C.S. THAT PROVIDES FOR APPEALS FROM ORDINANCES,
    29  RESOLUTIONS, MAPS AND SIMILAR ACTIONS OF A POLITICAL
    30  SUBDIVISION.
    20070H1329B3192                 - 10 -     

     1     Section 3 7.  This act shall take effect immediately.          <--




















    E8L53JLW/20070H1329B3192        - 11 -