See other bills
under the
same topic
                                                       PRINTER'S NO. 571

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA


HOUSE BILL

No. 509 Session of 1989


        INTRODUCED BY FREIND, VROON, TRELLO, FLICK, GODSHALL, DeLUCA,
           CLYMER, JOHNSON, BUNT, GRUPPO, ROBBINS, ADOLPH, KOSINSKI,
           GLADECK, GEIST, FOX, MORRIS, NAHILL, MOEHLMANN, TIGUE,
           DEMPSEY, ACOSTA, MICOZZIE, CAWLEY, BELARDI, CALTAGIRONE,
           McCALL, MERRY, SCHEETZ, D. W. SNYDER, MELIO, SERAFINI,
           WESTON, SAURMAN, CIVERA, RAYMOND, BURD, RITTER, HASAY,
           E. Z. TAYLOR AND LANGTRY, FEBRUARY 15, 1989

        REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, FEBRUARY 15, 1989

                                     AN ACT

     1  Amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania
     2     Consolidated Statutes, abrogating the defense of insanity.

     3     The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
     4  hereby enacts as follows:
     5     Section 1.  Sections 314 and 315 of Title 18 of the
     6  Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes are amended to read:
     7  § 314.  Guilty but mentally ill.
     8     (a)  General rule.--A person [who timely offers a defense of
     9  insanity in accordance with the Rules of Criminal Procedure] may
    10  be found "guilty but mentally ill" at trial if the trier of
    11  facts finds, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the person is
    12  guilty of an offense[,] and was mentally ill at the time of the
    13  commission of the offense [and was not legally insane at the
    14  time of the commission of the offense].
    15     (b)  Plea of guilty but mentally ill.--A person who waives


     1  his right to trial may plead guilty but mentally ill. No plea of
     2  guilty but mentally ill may be accepted by the trial judge until
     3  he has examined all reports prepared pursuant to the Rules of
     4  Criminal Procedure, has held a hearing on the sole issue of the
     5  defendant's mental illness at which either party may present
     6  evidence and is satisfied that the defendant was mentally ill at
     7  the time of the offense to which the plea is entered. If the
     8  trial judge refuses to accept a plea of guilty but mentally ill,
     9  the defendant shall be permitted to withdraw his plea. A
    10  defendant whose plea is not accepted by the court shall be
    11  entitled to a jury trial, except that if a defendant
    12  subsequently waives his right to a jury trial, the judge who
    13  presided at the hearing on mental illness shall not preside at
    14  the trial.
    15     (c)  Definitions.--For the purposes of this section and 42
    16  Pa.C.S. § 9727 (relating to disposition of persons found guilty
    17  but mentally ill)[:
    18         (1)  "Mentally ill."  One], the term "mentally ill" means
    19     one who as a result of mental disease or defect, lacks
    20     substantial capacity either to appreciate the wrongfulness of
    21     his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of
    22     the law.
    23         [(2)  "Legal insanity."  At the time of the commission of
    24     the act, the defendant was laboring under such a defect of
    25     reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature
    26     and quality of the act he was doing or, if he did know it,
    27     that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.
    28     (d)  Common law M'Naghten's Rule preserved.--Nothing in this
    29  section shall be deemed to repeal or otherwise abrogate the
    30  common law defense of insanity (M'Naghten's Rule) in effect in
    19890H0509B0571                  - 2 -

     1  this Commonwealth on the effective date of this section.]
     2     (d)  Common law M'Naghten's Rule abrogated.--The common law
     3  defense of insanity (M'Naghten's Rule) is hereby abrogated and
     4  repealed.
     5  § 315.  Insanity.
     6     [(a)  General rule.--The mental soundness of an actor engaged
     7  in conduct charged to constitute an offense shall only be a
     8  defense to the charged offense when the actor proves by a
     9  preponderance of evidence that the actor was legally insane at
    10  the time of the commission of the offense.
    11     (b)  Definition.--For purposes of this section, the phrase
    12  "legally insane" means that, at the time of the commission of
    13  the offense, the actor was laboring under such a defect of
    14  reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and
    15  quality of the act he was doing or, if the actor did know the
    16  quality of the act, that he did not know that what he was doing
    17  was wrong.]
    18     The insanity of an actor shall not be a defense to any
    19  charged offense.
    20     Section 2.  All acts and parts of acts are repealed insofar
    21  as they are inconsistent with this act.
    22     Section 3.  This act shall take effect immediately.






    B7L18RDG/19890H0509B0571         - 3 -