The Attorney General shall bring an action against the
employer in the county where the unauthorized employee is or
was employed by the employer. The Attorney General shall not
bring an action against an employer for a violation that
occurred before the effective date of this section.
(h) Expedited action.--Upon docketing, the court shall
expedite the action, including assigning the hearing at the
earliest practicable date.
(i) Determination.--In determining whether an employee is an
unauthorized employee, the court shall consider only the Federal
Government's determination under section 642(c) of the Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. The
Federal Government's determination shall create a rebuttable
presumption of the employee's status. The court may take
judicial notice of the Federal Government's determination and
may request the Federal Government to provide automated or
testimonial verification under section 642(c) of the Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.
(j) Rebuttable presumption.--Proof that the employer
verified the employment authorization of an employee through the
E-Verify program shall create a rebuttable presumption that an
employer did not knowingly employ an unauthorized employee.
(k) Affirmative defense.--For the purposes of this section,
it shall be an affirmative defense if the employer demonstrates
that it has complied in good faith with section 274A(b) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (66 Stat. 163, 8 U.S.C. §
1324a(b)). An employer shall be considered to have complied with
section 274A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,
notwithstanding an isolated, sporadic or accidental technical or
procedural failure to meet the requirements, if the employer
A02909 - 7 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30