Test Drive Our New Site! We have some improvements in the works that we're excited for you to experience. Click here to try our new, faster, mobile friendly beta site. We will be maintaining our current version of the site thru the end of 2024, so you can switch back as our improvements continue.
Legislation Quick Search
04/24/2024 06:37 PM
Pennsylvania House of Representatives
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legis/CSM/showMemoPublic.cfm?chamber=H&SPick=20230&cosponId=39445
Share:
Home / House Co-Sponsorship Memoranda

House Co-Sponsorship Memoranda

Subscribe to PaLegis Notifications
NEW!

Subscribe to receive notifications of new Co-Sponsorship Memos circulated

By Member | By Date | Keyword Search


House of Representatives
Session of 2023 - 2024 Regular Session

MEMORANDUM

Posted: January 23, 2023 12:47 PM
From: Representative Abby Major
To: All House members
Subject: Revisiting Entry into ARD as Basis for Founded Child Abuse Report
 
In the near future, I plan to introduce legislation to discontinue acceptance into an accelerated rehabilitative disposition program (commonly known as ARD) as a basis for designating a report of suspected child abuse report as “founded.” For the reasons that follow, I believe this will better ensure fairness and administrative due process.
 
By way of background, a child abuse report that is substantiated is designated either as “indicated” or “founded,” with the difference essentially being that, in a founded report, there was either a guilty plea in a criminal proceeding or the facts supporting the finding of abuse were previously adjudicated. Because the perpetrator was already given notice of and to be heard in the prior proceeding, as well as the right to appeal the underlying adjudication, the Child Protective Services Law  (CPSL) does not provide for an administrative appeal from a founded report.
 
The problem is that ARD is not an adjudication, nor is it an admission of guilt. Acceptance into ARD is a non-final deferment of an adjudication, which the court makes in its discretion without a record hearing and without any factual determinations on the merits. It is for these reasons, in combination with the requirements of the Administrative Agency Law, that the PA Supreme Court held earlier this year* that “a named perpetrator in a report designated as ‘founded’ based upon the perpetrator's voluntary entry into [ARD] is entitled to an administrative hearing.”
 
Under my legislation, the report of abuse will be investigated and if substantial evidence of the alleged abuse exists, the report will be designated as an “indicated report”.

This will ensure that the perpetrator is listed on the statewide database, but will also confer the appeal rights set forth in the CPSL, as required by the Supreme Court. I invite you to join me in sponsoring this important legislation.
 
J.F. v. Dep't of Hum. Servs., 245 A.3d 658 (Pa. 2021)
  



Introduced as HB43