Test Drive Our New Site! We have some improvements in the works that we're excited for you to experience. Click here to try our new, faster, mobile friendly beta site. We will be maintaining our current version of the site thru the end of 2024, so you can switch back as our improvements continue.
Legislation Quick Search
04/25/2024 03:55 AM
Pennsylvania House of Representatives
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legis/CSM/showMemoPublic.cfm?chamber=H&SPick=20150&cosponId=18213
Share:
Home / House Co-Sponsorship Memoranda

House Co-Sponsorship Memoranda

Subscribe to PaLegis Notifications
NEW!

Subscribe to receive notifications of new Co-Sponsorship Memos circulated

By Member | By Date | Keyword Search


House of Representatives
Session of 2015 - 2016 Regular Session

MEMORANDUM

Posted: April 29, 2015 09:22 AM
From: Representative Jaret Gibbons
To: All House members
Subject: Judicial Discretion – Dividing Military Retirement Income in Divorce Proceedings
 
In the near future, I plan to re-introduce legislation – House Bill 1192 – to amend Title 23 (Domestic Relations) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to allow for judicial discretion when determining the divisibility of military retirement income in divorce proceedings.

Under the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act of 1982, the federal government extends the right to states to determine whether military retirement income is classified as marital property. While standard pensions are viewed as divisible in all fifty states, per U.S. Department of Defense policy, military retirement income is not a pension; it is reduced pay for reduced services while in the Retired Reserves.

My legislation would specify that the court may treat disposable retired pay or retainer pay, payable to a military member, either as property solely of the member or as property of the member and the spouse of the member. If the court determines that the disposable retired pay or retainer pay of a military member is marital property, the court will be required to calculate the amount consistent with the rank, pay grade and length of service of the member at the time of separation.

Given the clear differences between military retirement pay and traditional pensions, the treatment of this pay as property should be considered more carefully by the judicial branch on a case-by-case basis to determine if the pay should be divided between the military member and the former spouse. Please join me in co-sponsoring this important legislation.

** Last Session’s co-sponsors included the following representatives: D. COSTA, KORTZ, STEVENSON, BENNINGHOFF, and JAMES

View Attachment


Introduced as HB1612