
and quality of the act he was doing or, if he did know it,
that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.
(d) Common law M'Naghten's Rule preserved.--Nothing in this
section shall be deemed to repeal or otherwise abrogate the
common law defense of insanity (M'Naghten's Rule) in effect in
this Commonwealth on the effective date of this section.] the
offense, the actor was laboring under such a defect of reason
from disease of the mind as not to know the nature and quality
of the act he was doing.
§ 315. Insanity.
(a) General rule.--The mental soundness of an actor [engaged
in conduct charged to constitute an offense shall only be a
defense to the charged offense when the actor proves by a
preponderance of evidence that the actor was legally insane at
the time of the commission of the offense.] shall not be a
defense to a charged offense. There shall be no verdict of not
guilty by reason of insanity.
(a.1) Admissibility of evidence.--Evidence of legal insanity
of the actor shall be admissible only for the purpose of proving
that the insanity rendered the actor incapable of forming the
requisite intent or state of mind that is an element of the
offense.
(b) Definition.--[For purposes of this section, the phrase
"legally insane"] As used in this section, the term "legal
insanity" means that, at the time of the commission of the
offense, the actor was laboring under such a defect of reason[,]
from disease of the mind[,] as not to know the nature and
quality of the act he was doing [or, if the actor did know the
quality of the act, that he did not know that what he was doing
was wrong].
20150SB0690PN0676 - 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30