| |
|
| |
| THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| |
| HOUSE RESOLUTION |
|
| |
| |
| INTRODUCED BY ROEBUCK, COHEN, STURLA, GRUCELA, LONGIETTI, M. O'BRIEN, MILNE, MURT, BISHOP, BRIGGS, CASORIO, GOODMAN, JOSEPHS, KOTIK, MUNDY, PARKER, PRESTON, READSHAW, SANTARSIERO, SIPTROTH, THOMAS, HESS AND GIBBONS, MARCH 12, 2010 |
| |
| |
| REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, MARCH 12, 2010 |
| |
| |
| |
| A RESOLUTION |
| |
1 | Directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to study |
2 | and to issue a report on the status and success of states' |
3 | efforts to implement School-Wide Positive Behavioral Support |
4 | in their public schools, including the efforts to implement |
5 | School-Wide Positive Behavioral Support in this Commonwealth, |
6 | and to make specific recommendations for legislative action. |
7 | WHEREAS, Educators, parents and general public cite negative |
8 | school climate and disruptive student behavior as challenges |
9 | that disrupt the learning environment in many public schools; |
10 | and |
11 | WHEREAS, Parents, community providers, including juvenile |
12 | justice, educators and the general public report increasing |
13 | degrees of behavioral health needs of children and adolescents |
14 | across urban, rural and suburban communities; and |
15 | WHEREAS, School-Wide Positive Behavior Support is an |
16 | evidence-based, data-driven approach that helps all children |
17 | acquire appropriate social skills and behavior and that can |
18 | prevent or identify early students' behavioral health needs, |
|
1 | enhance students' resiliency and improve students' school |
2 | performance; and |
3 | WHEREAS, School-Wide Positive Behavioral Support consists of |
4 | the following: |
5 | (1) Schools use a three-tiered approach to prevention |
6 | and early intervention that reflects universal prevention for |
7 | all students, targeted prevention and intervention, for |
8 | students who appear at risk to develop serious problem |
9 | behavior and intensive prevention and intervention inclusive |
10 | of services and supports, for individual students with |
11 | serious problem behavior or social and emotional support |
12 | needs. |
13 | (2) School staff employ essential School-Wide Positive |
14 | Behavior Support practices consistently across all settings |
15 | within implementing schools in order to establish a |
16 | predictable and positive school culture for all students and |
17 | staff by setting clear behavioral expectations and frequently |
18 | acknowledging and rewarding students when they exhibit |
19 | expected behaviors. |
20 | (3) School-Wide Positive Behavior Support is implemented |
21 | systematically over time and emphasizes the annual use of |
22 | published fidelity measures, including, but not limited to, |
23 | the School-Wide Evaluation Tool and the Benchmarks of |
24 | Quality. |
25 | (4) Schools establish processes and procedures to |
26 | address behavioral needs of all students across all three |
27 | tiers of the School-Wide Positive Behavior Support continuum. |
28 | (5) School staff are provided training and technical |
29 | assistance to implement School-Wide Positive Behavior Support |
30 | with fidelity. |
|
1 | (6) Schools that initiate School-Wide Positive Behavior |
2 | Support meet certain readiness requirements and schools and |
3 | school districts provide adequate leadership to meet |
4 | readiness requirements as well as meet ongoing targeted goals |
5 | throughout implementation in a longitudinal manner. |
6 | (7) Schools implementing School-Wide Positive Behavior |
7 | Support collect and report appropriate data and use their |
8 | data for decision-making purposes; |
9 | and |
10 | WHEREAS, Schools and school districts across the nation that |
11 | have implemented School-Wide Positive Behavior Support have |
12 | shown positive results. As of September 2009, the United States |
13 | Office of Special Education Programs Technical Assistance Center |
14 | on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports was working |
15 | directly with more than 10,000 schools in 48 states and the |
16 | District of Columbia; and |
17 | WHEREAS, As of June 2009, Illinois had implemented School- |
18 | Wide Positive Behavior Support in 1,081 schools in 268 school |
19 | districts; and |
20 | WHEREAS, School-Wide Positive Behavior Support is operational |
21 | in at least some of the schools in all 24 school districts in |
22 | Maryland. Of the elementary schools that have employed this |
23 | approach with fidelity, more than 95% report that at least 80% |
24 | of their students had fewer than one discipline referral per |
25 | year. In Baltimore County schools that have implemented the |
26 | School-Wide Positive Behavior Support model, eighth grade math |
27 | scores increased 53% in schools reporting implementation of |
28 | School-Wide Positive Behavior Support from 2003 through 2007, as |
29 | compared to a 33.3% increase for other schools not implementing |
30 | School-Wide Positive Behavior Support; and |
|
1 | WHEREAS, School-Wide Positive Behavior Support is cost |
2 | effective; and |
3 | WHEREAS, Schools implementing School-Wide Positive Behavior |
4 | Support report a decrease in disciplinary referrals. As a |
5 | result, schools recover both administrator time that can be |
6 | reinvested and regain student instructional time in classrooms; |
7 | and |
8 | WHEREAS, In one year 12 Maryland schools implementing School- |
9 | Wide Positive Behavior Support reported 5,606 fewer office |
10 | referrals than in the previous year. Based on the calculation |
11 | that each office referral takes 15 minutes of administrator time |
12 | and 45 minutes of student instructional time in a six-hour |
13 | school day, these schools saved 233 days of administrator time |
14 | and 700 days of student instructional time as a result of this |
15 | reduction in office disciplinary referrals; and |
16 | WHEREAS, Currently, at least 105 Pennsylvania schools in 38 |
17 | school districts are in various stages of implementing School- |
18 | Wide Positive Behavior Support, most with assistance from the |
19 | Department of Education; therefore be it |
20 | RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives direct the |
21 | Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct and review |
22 | research assessing the effectiveness of School-Wide Positive |
23 | Behavior Support in Pennsylvania and in other states; and be it |
24 | further |
25 | RESOLVED, That the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee |
26 | investigate and document the extent to which School-Wide |
27 | Positive Behavior Support has been implemented in this |
28 | Commonwealth, the outcomes in terms of student performance and |
29 | school climate that have been achieved and the barriers that |
30 | exist to further expansion; and be it further |
|
1 | RESOLVED, That the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee |
2 | identify the cost, cost savings for schools and possible |
3 | mechanisms for expanding School-Wide Positive Behavior Support |
4 | to all schools and school districts in this Commonwealth that |
5 | seek to implement School-Wide Positive Behavior Support and |
6 | further identify all existing Federal, State and local funding |
7 | streams that can be used for these expansion efforts; and be it |
8 | further |
9 | RESOLVED, That the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee |
10 | provide recommendations on whether and how to expand and fund |
11 | School-Wide Positive Behavior Support in Pennsylvania; and be it |
12 | further |
13 | RESOLVED, That the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee |
14 | prepare a report of its findings and transmit copies of the |
15 | report to the House of Representatives no later than six months |
16 | after the adoption of this resolution. |
|