PRINTER'S NO.  3153

  

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA

  

HOUSE RESOLUTION

 

No.

609

Session of

2010

  

  

INTRODUCED BY CHRISTIANA, SOLOBAY, ELLIS, BARRAR, BENNINGHOFF, BOYD, CLYMER, CREIGHTON, CUTLER, DENLINGER, EVERETT, GABLER, GEIST, HARHART, HARRIS, MUSTIO, O'NEILL, PYLE, SCAVELLO, STEVENSON, SWANGER, TALLMAN AND WATSON, JANUARY 27, 2010

  

  

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY, JANUARY 27, 2010  

  

  

  

A RESOLUTION

  

1

Supporting continued State regulation of hydraulic fracturing

2

and urging the Congress of the United States not to approve

3

legislation that would remove State hydraulic fracturing

4

regulating practices under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

5

WHEREAS, Pennsylvania forever changed the trajectory of the

6

world economy 150 years ago with the first commercial discovery

7

of oil in Titusville, Crawford County; and

8

WHEREAS, Again today, Pennsylvania is making transformational

9

economic and technological progress through the safe,

10

responsible and heavily regulated Marcellus shale gas production

11

enabled by hydraulic fracturing; and

12

WHEREAS, Domestic natural gas production will ensure that the

13

United States continues on the path to energy independence and

14

economic competitiveness; and

15

WHEREAS, Hydraulic fracturing, which has been in commercial

16

use for more than 60 years, as well as other advances in

17

exploration technology, has helped generate a 45% increase in

 


1

proven United States natural gas reserves, representing more

2

than 100 years of available supply at current rates of

3

consumption; and

4

WHEREAS, The Congress of the United States passed the Safe

5

Drinking Water Act (Public Law 93-523, 21 U.S.C. § 349 and 42

6

U.S.C. §§ 201 and 300f et seq.) to ensure the protection of the

7

nation's drinking water resources; and

8

WHEREAS, At no time during the consideration or

9

implementation of the Safe Drinking Water Act did the

10

Environmental Protection Agency ever interpret hydraulic

11

fracturing as constituting "underground injection" under that

12

law; and

13

WHEREAS, In 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency

14

published a final report that summarized a study evaluating the

15

potential threat to underground sources of drinking water from

16

hydraulic fracturing, which report concluded that "additional or

17

further study is not warranted at this time" and that "the

18

injection of hydraulic fracturing fluids into" coal bed methane

19

wells "poses minimal threat to" underground sources of drinking

20

water; and

21

WHEREAS, The Congress of the United States, in the bipartisan

22

Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-58, 11 Stat. 594),

23

which act was supported by then-Senator Barack Obama, explicitly

24

clarified the intent of the Congress of the United States

25

relating to hydraulic fracturing and specifically stated that

26

the act was never intended to be regulated under the Safe

27

Drinking Water Act; and

28

WHEREAS, The then EPA Administrator, now assistant to the

29

President of the United States for energy and climate change,

30

stated at the time that "there is no evidence that hydraulic

- 2 -

 


1

fracturing has resulted in any contamination or endangerment of

2

underground sources of drinking water"; and

3

WHEREAS, The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission

4

conducted a survey of oil and gas producing states that found no

5

known cases of groundwater contamination associated with

6

hydraulic fracturing; and

7

WHEREAS, Each year, approximately 35,000 wells are

8

hydraulically fractured in the United States and, since the

9

technique's inception, more than 1.1 million wells have been

10

hydraulically fractured in the United States with no known harm

11

to groundwater; and

12

WHEREAS, The Safe Drinking Water Act was never intended to

13

grant to the Federal Government authority to regulate oil and

14

gas drilling and production operations such as hydraulic

15

fracturing under the Underground Injection Control program; and

16

WHEREAS, The member states of the Interstate Oil and Gas

17

Compact Commission have adopted comprehensive laws and

18

regulations to protect the nation's drinking water resources and

19

have trained personnel to effectively regulate oil and gas

20

exploration and production; and

21

WHEREAS, Regulation of hydraulic fracturing as a category of

22

underground injection under the Safe Drinking Water Act will

23

impose significant administrative costs on Pennsylvania and

24

substantially increase the cost of energy production, with no

25

resulting environmental benefits; and

26

WHEREAS, Regulation of hydraulic fracturing under the Safe

27

Drinking Water Act will increase energy costs to Pennsylvania

28

families, seniors and small businesses; and

29

WHEREAS, A recent Pennsylvania State University study found

30

that Marcellus gas production generated $2.3 billion in total

- 3 -

 


1

value added in 2008, more than 29,000 jobs and $240 million in

2

State and local taxes; and

3

WHEREAS, The Pennsylvania State University study found that

4

Marcellus gas production could potentially generate $3.8 billion

5

in economic output, more than $400 million in State and local

6

taxes and help create more than $48,000 jobs in 2009; and

7

WHEREAS, The study also determined that the Marcellus

8

industry could generate $13.5 billion in value added and almost

9

175,000 jobs in 2020; and

10

WHEREAS, The present value of additional State and local

11

taxes earned from Marcellus development between now and 2020 is

12

almost $12 billion; therefore be it

13

RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives of the

14

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania support continued State regulation

15

of hydraulic fracturing and urge the Congress of the United

16

States not to approve legislation that would remove State

17

hydraulic fracturing regulating practices under the Safe

18

Drinking Water Act; and be it further

19

RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives support the

20

energy technology known as hydraulic fracturing and urge the

21

Congress of the United States not to pass legislation that will

22

destroy the current regulatory partnership presently observed in

23

relation to the process.

- 4 -