PRINTER'S NO.  2007

  

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA

  

HOUSE RESOLUTION

 

No.

334

Session of

2009

  

  

INTRODUCED BY LEVDANSKY, YUDICHAK, SCAVELLO, WHITE, D. COSTA, P. COSTA, FRANKEL, FREEMAN, GINGRICH, GRUCELA, HALUSKA, KORTZ, MANDERINO, MARKOSEK, MILLARD, MILNE, MUNDY, MURPHY, MURT, READSHAW, SIPTROTH, K. SMITH, SOLOBAY, STABACK, STURLA, SWANGER, WAGNER, WATERS AND YOUNGBLOOD, JUNE 5, 2009

  

  

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON FINANCE, JUNE 5, 2009  

  

  

  

A RESOLUTION

  

1

Directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee, in

2

conjunction with the Local Government Commission and the

3

State Tax Equalization Board, to request the assistance of

4

the Assessors and County Commissioners Associations of

5

Pennsylvania to conduct a study of the Commonwealth's

6

fragmented system of property tax assessment, compare it to

7

real property tax systems of other states, including

8

specifically the real property tax reassessment systems of

9

Maryland and California, and identify measures to make the

10

Pennsylvania system more uniform, transparent, cost effective

11

and acceptable to the taxpayer, as well as determining the

12

impact of adopting the Maryland system.

13

WHEREAS, Pennsylvania operates under at least five major

14

assessment statutes, none of which are wholly consistent with

15

the others; and

16

WHEREAS, Each county operates under at least two statutes

17

concurrently, and there are assessment provisions sprinkled

18

among other statutes (County Code, e.g.) as well; and

19

WHEREAS, At least two home rule counties provide for

20

different administrative procedures in their home charters than

21

exist in State statute that previously applied to them; and

 


1

WHEREAS, There are no uniform revenue restraints for all

2

classes of political subdivisions following the implementation

3

of a countywide reassessment; and

4

WHEREAS, The current system provides little protection for

5

taxpayers who experience sudden and dramatic increases in their

6

property assessment as a result of a countywide reassessment;

7

and

8

WHEREAS, The current system results in a lack of uniformity

9

from county to county and property to property resulting in vast

10

inequities among taxpayers and taxing jurisdictions; and

11

WHEREAS, There is no funding base for reassessment, and the

12

significant expense of reassessment is the single greatest

13

reason they are not done regularly; therefore be it

14

RESOLVED, That the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee,

15

in conjunction with the Local Government Commission and the

16

State Tax Equalization Board, request the assistance of the

17

Assessors and County Commissioners Associations of Pennsylvania

18

to conduct a study of the current property tax assessment

19

systems operating in this Commonwealth; and be it further

20

RESOLVED, That the study shall include an analysis of the

21

following:

22

(1)  The current systems of property tax reassessment in

23

Pennsylvania.

24

(2)  The current systems and property tax reassessment in

25

effect in Maryland and California.

26

(3)  The systems of property tax reassessment in effect

27

in other states with demographics similar to Pennsylvania;

28

and be it further

29

RESOLVED, That the study of each state's property tax

30

reassessment system shall include at least the following:

- 2 -

 


1

(1)  what levels of government levy the property tax,

2

(2)  who conducts the real property tax reassessment, is

3

it a state or a local function and are government employees

4

used or is it contracted out,

5

(3)  how are the property reassessments financed,

6

(4)  how often are the property reassessments conducted,

7

(5)  are there uniform procedures throughout the state,

8

(6)  are there taxpayer protections as to the amount of

9

additional revenue which may be generated by the taxing

10

district and limitations on how much individual taxpayers can

11

have their taxes increased immediately following a

12

reassessment,

13

(7)  how does the system for appeals operate, and

14

(8)  are there constitutional provisions that impact the

15

property tax reassessment;

16

and be it further

17

RESOLVED, That the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee

18

provide recommendations necessary or desirable to improve and

19

update the system of property tax assessment in Pennsylvania;

20

and be it further

21

RESOLVED, That the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee

22

report to the House of Representatives the result of its studies

23

and recommendations and file the report with the Chief Clerk of

24

the House of Representatives no later than June 30, 2010.

- 3 -