See other bills
under the
same topic
                                                      PRINTER'S NO. 1736

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA


HOUSE BILL

No. 1389 Session of 2007


        INTRODUCED BY WALKO, BELFANTI, CREIGHTON, CURRY, HENNESSEY,
           JAMES, KORTZ, KOTIK, LEACH, MAHONEY, PALLONE, PETRARCA,
           RAMALEY, SABATINA, SIPTROTH, McILVAINE SMITH AND YOUNGBLOOD,
           MAY 29, 2007

        REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, MAY 29, 2007

                                     AN ACT

     1  Amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the
     2     Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, providing for permissible
     3     argument as to damages at trial.

     4     The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
     5  hereby enacts as follows:
     6     Section 1.  Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated
     7  Statutes is amended by adding a section to read:
     8  § 4566.  Permissible argument as to damages at trial.
     9     (a)  Permissible argument.--Subject to subsection (b), in any
    10  civil action tried before a judge, jury or other tribunal, a
    11  party may make any of the following arguments during closing
    12  argument and after the judge, jury or other tribunal, has
    13  requested for the argument to be made:
    14         (1)  Specifically argue in lump sums or by mathematical
    15     formula the amount he or she deems to be an appropriate award
    16     for all past and future economic or noneconomic damages or
    17     both economic and noneconomic damages claimed to be


     1     recoverable.
     2         (2)  Argue that an award of zero damages is appropriate,
     3     even if there is a finding of liability against the
     4     defendant.
     5     (b)  Disclosure.--
     6         (1)  Except as provided in paragraph (2), a party may not
     7     argue a specific sum as provided in subsection (a) unless the
     8     party first discloses to the court and opposing counsel that
     9     the party intends to argue the specific damages listed in
    10     subsection (a) prior to the presentation of closing
    11     arguments.
    12         (2)  Notwithstanding paragraph (1), arguments as to
    13     appropriate amount of economic damages may be made without
    14     notice to opposing counsel if evidence supporting economic
    15     damages has been introduced to trial.
    16     (c)  Facts and evidence.--Nothing in this section shall be
    17  construed to prevent a defendant from arguing in any case that
    18  the facts and evidence support a finding of no liability.
    19     (d)  Jury instruction.--Whenever, in a civil action, tried
    20  before a jury, a specific lump sum or mathematical formula is
    21  argued during closing arguments as provided for in subsection
    22  (a), the trial court shall instruct the jury that the sum or
    23  mathematical formula argued is not evidence but only arguments
    24  and that the determination of the amount of appropriate damages
    25  to be awarded, if any, is solely for the jury's determination.
    26     Section 2.  This act shall take effect in 60 days.



    B8L42MSP/20070H1389B1736         - 2 -