See other bills
under the
same topic
        PRIOR PRINTER'S NO. 2504                      PRINTER'S NO. 2911

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA


HOUSE BILL

No. 1917 Session of 2003


        INTRODUCED BY HARPER, HERMAN, DAILEY, TANGRETTI, WATSON, BARRAR,
           CLYMER, CRAHALLA, DENLINGER, FEESE, FICHTER, GRUCELA,
           HERSHEY, McILHINNEY, O'NEILL, PAYNE, PETRI, RUBLEY, SCAVELLO,
           STEIL, WEBER, YOUNGBLOOD, ROSS, BALDWIN, HENNESSEY, SATHER,
           LaGROTTA, MUNDY, HORSEY AND ZUG, AUGUST 5, 2003

        AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT, HOUSE OF
           REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, NOVEMBER 17, 2003

                                     AN ACT

     1  Amending the act of July 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), entitled,
     2     as amended, "An act to empower cities of the second class A,
     3     and third class, boroughs, incorporated towns, townships of
     4     the first and second classes including those within a county
     5     of the second class and counties of the second through eighth
     6     classes, individually or jointly, to plan their development
     7     and to govern the same by zoning, subdivision and land
     8     development ordinances, planned residential development and
     9     other ordinances, by official maps, by the reservation of
    10     certain land for future public purpose and by the acquisition
    11     of such land; to promote the conservation of energy through
    12     the use of planning practices and to promote the effective
    13     utilization of renewable energy sources; providing for the
    14     establishment of planning commissions, planning departments,
    15     planning committees and zoning hearing boards, authorizing
    16     them to charge fees, make inspections and hold public
    17     hearings; providing for mediation; providing for transferable
    18     development rights; providing for appropriations, appeals to
    19     courts and penalties for violations; and repealing acts and
    20     parts of acts," further providing for contents of subdivision  <--
    21     and land development ordinance. FEES CHARGED BY THE            <--
    22     MUNICIPALITY.

    23     The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    24  hereby enacts as follows:
    25     Section 1.  Section 503(1) of the act of July 31, 1968
    26  (P.L.805, No.247), known as the Pennsylvania Municipalities

     1  Planning Code, reenacted and amended December 21, 1988
     2  (P.L.1329, No.170) and amended June 22, 2000 (P.L.495, No.68),
     3  is amended to read:
     4     Section 503.  Contents of Subdivision and Land Development
     5  Ordinance.--The subdivision and land development ordinance may
     6  include, but need not be limited to:
     7         (1)  Provisions for the submittal and processing of
     8     plats, including the charging of review fees, and
     9     specifications for such plats, including certification as to
    10     the accuracy of plats and provisions for preliminary and
    11     final approval and for processing of final approval by stages
    12     or sections of development. Such plats and surveys shall be
    13     prepared in accordance with the act of May 23, 1945 (P.L.913,
    14     No.367), known as the "Engineer, Land Surveyor and Geologist
    15     Registration Law," except that this requirement shall not
    16     preclude the preparation of a plat in accordance with the act
    17     of January 24, 1966 (1965 P.L.1527, No.535), known as the
    18     "Landscape Architects' Registration Law," when it is
    19     appropriate to prepare the plat using professional services
    20     as set forth in the definition of the "practice of landscape
    21     architecture" under section 2 of that act. Review fees may
    22     include reasonable and necessary charges by the
    23     municipality's SOLICITOR, professional consultants,            <--
    24     including, but not limited to, the municipality's solicitors
    25     or other providers of legal service, or engineer for review
    26     and report thereon to the municipality. Such review fees
    27     shall be based upon a schedule established by ordinance or
    28     resolution. Such review fees shall be reasonable and in
    29     accordance with the ordinary and customary charges by the
    30     municipal SOLICITOR, engineer or consultant for similar        <--
    20030H1917B2911                  - 2 -     

     1     service in the community, but in no event shall the fees
     2     exceed the rate or cost charged by the SOLICITOR, engineer or  <--
     3     consultant to the municipalities when fees are not reimbursed
     4     or otherwise imposed on applicants.
     5             (i)  In the event the applicant disputes the amount
     6         of any such review fees, the applicant shall, within 14
     7         days of the applicant's receipt of the bill, notify the
     8         municipality that such fees are disputed, in which case
     9         the municipality shall not delay or disapprove a
    10         subdivision or land development application due to the
    11         applicant's request over disputed fees.
    12             (ii)  In the event that the municipality and the
    13         applicant cannot agree on the amount of review fees which
    14         are reasonable and necessary, then the applicant and the
    15         municipality shall follow the procedure for dispute
    16         resolution set forth in section 510(g), provided that the
    17         professionals resolving such dispute shall be of the same
    18         profession or discipline as the consultants whose fees
    19         are being disputed.
    20         * * *
    21     SECTION 2.  SECTION 510(G) OF THE ACT IS AMENDED TO READ:      <--
    22     SECTION 510.  RELEASE FROM IMPROVEMENT BOND.--* * *
    23     (G)  THE MUNICIPALITY MAY PRESCRIBE THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL
    24  REIMBURSE THE MUNICIPALITY FOR THE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY
    25  EXPENSE INCURRED FOR THE INSPECTION OF IMPROVEMENTS. SUCH
    26  REIMBURSEMENT SHALL BE BASED UPON A SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED BY
    27  ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION. SUCH EXPENSE SHALL BE REASONABLE AND IN
    28  ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORDINARY AND CUSTOMARY FEES CHARGED BY THE
    29  MUNICIPAL SOLICITOR, ENGINEER OR CONSULTANT FOR WORK PERFORMED
    30  FOR SIMILAR SERVICES IN THE COMMUNITY, BUT IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
    20030H1917B2911                  - 3 -     

     1  FEES EXCEED THE RATE OR COST CHARGED BY THE SOLICITOR, ENGINEER
     2  OR CONSULTANT TO THE MUNICIPALITIES WHEN FEES ARE NOT REIMBURSED
     3  OR OTHERWISE IMPOSED ON APPLICANTS.
     4         (1)  IN THE EVENT THE APPLICANT DISPUTES THE AMOUNT OF
     5     ANY SUCH EXPENSE IN CONNECTION WITH THE INSPECTION OF
     6     IMPROVEMENTS, THE APPLICANT SHALL, WITHIN TEN WORKING DAYS OF
     7     THE DATE OF BILLING, NOTIFY THE MUNICIPALITY THAT SUCH
     8     EXPENSES ARE DISPUTED AS UNREASONABLE OR UNNECESSARY, IN
     9     WHICH CASE THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL NOT DELAY OR DISAPPROVE A
    10     SUBDIVISION OR LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION OR ANY APPROVAL
    11     OR PERMIT RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT DUE TO THE APPLICANT'S
    12     REQUEST OVER DISPUTED ENGINEER EXPENSES.
    13         (2)  IF, WITHIN 20 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF BILLING, THE
    14     MUNICIPALITY AND THE APPLICANT CANNOT AGREE ON THE AMOUNT OF
    15     EXPENSES WHICH ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY, THEN THE
    16     APPLICANT AND MUNICIPALITY SHALL JOINTLY, BY MUTUAL
    17     AGREEMENT, APPOINT ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR ATTORNEY,
    18     AS THE CASE MAY BE, LICENSED AS SUCH IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF
    19     PENNSYLVANIA TO REVIEW THE SAID EXPENSES AND MAKE A
    20     DETERMINATION AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF WHICH IS REASONABLE
    21     AND NECESSARY.
    22         (3)  THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR ATTORNEY SO APPOINTED
    23     SHALL HEAR SUCH EVIDENCE AND REVIEW SUCH DOCUMENTATION AS THE
    24     PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR ATTORNEY IN HIS OR HER SOLE OPINION
    25     DEEMS NECESSARY AND RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 50 DAYS OF THE
    26     BILLING DATE. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE
    27     ENTIRE AMOUNT DETERMINED IN THE DECISION IMMEDIATELY.
    28         (4)  IN THE EVENT THAT THE MUNICIPALITY AND APPLICANT
    29     CANNOT AGREE UPON THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR ATTORNEY TO BE
    30     APPOINTED WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE BILLING DATE, THEN, UPON
    20030H1917B2911                  - 4 -     

     1     APPLICATION OF EITHER PARTY, THE PRESIDENT JUDGE OF THE COURT
     2     OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN WHICH THE
     3     MUNICIPALITY IS LOCATED (OR IF AT THE TIME THERE BE NO
     4     PRESIDENT JUDGE, THEN THE SENIOR ACTIVE JUDGE THEN SITTING)
     5     SHALL APPOINT SUCH ENGINEER OR ATTORNEY, WHO, IN THAT CASE,
     6     SHALL BE NEITHER THE MUNICIPAL ENGINEER NOR ANY PROFESSIONAL
     7     ENGINEER OR ATTORNEY WHO HAS BEEN RETAINED BY, OR PERFORMED
     8     SERVICES FOR, THE MUNICIPALITY OR THE APPLICANT WITHIN THE
     9     PRECEDING FIVE YEARS.
    10         (5)  THE FEE OF THE APPOINTED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR
    11     ATTORNEY FOR DETERMINING THE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY
    12     EXPENSES SHALL BE PAID BY THE APPLICANT IF THE AMOUNT OF
    13     PAYMENT REQUIRED IN THE DECISION IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
    14     THE ORIGINAL BILL. IF THE AMOUNT OF PAYMENT REQUIRED IN THE
    15     DECISION IS LESS THAN THE ORIGINAL BILL BY $1,000 OR MORE,
    16     THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL PAY THE FEE OF THE PROFESSIONAL
    17     ENGINEER OR ATTORNEY, BUT OTHERWISE THE MUNICIPALITY AND THE
    18     APPLICANT SHALL EACH PAY ONE-HALF OF THE FEE OF THE APPOINTED
    19     PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR ATTORNEY.
    20     Section 2 3.  This act shall take effect in 60 days.           <--







    G16L53DMS/20030H1917B2911        - 5 -