PRINTER'S NO. 601

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA


HOUSE RESOLUTION

No. 28 Session of 1991


        INTRODUCED BY VROON, GODSHALL, KOSINSKI, FLEAGLE, CLYMER,
           BARLEY, E. Z. TAYLOR, LESCOVITZ, DEMPSEY, TRELLO, HERSHEY,
           LEH, COY, NOYE, PITTS, M. N. WRIGHT, PESCI, BIRMELIN,
           JOHNSON, FARGO, CARLSON, HALUSKA, WILSON, LAWLESS, BATTISTO,
           GAMBLE, LAUGHLIN, SAURMAN, KASUNIC, GERLACH, COLAFELLA,
           BILLOW, CAWLEY AND ARMSTRONG, MARCH 11, 1991

        REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON RULES, MARCH 11, 1991

                                  A RESOLUTION

     1  Expressing concern about court-imposed bans upon expression of
     2     religious thought and the mention of God at commencement
     3     exercises.

     4     WHEREAS, Many Pennsylvania public schools have a deeply
     5  rooted and historic tradition of conducting commencement
     6  ceremonies for graduating students that include speeches in
     7  which student, school officials and other speakers occasionally
     8  express religious thought and invoke the name of God and include
     9  invocations and benedictions where clergy and other persons
    10  offer prayer and invoke the name of God; and
    11     WHEREAS, A few students and their parents, with the
    12  assistance of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), filed
    13  lawsuits against school officials to prohibit invocations,
    14  benedictions and ceremonies containing any religious traditions
    15  at the commencement exercises for graduating seniors at the
    16  Downingtown Area Senior High School and at the Owen J. Roberts


     1  High School in Chester County, Pennsylvania; and
     2     WHEREAS, These ACLU-initiated lawsuits resulted in the
     3  issuance of Federal court orders banning prayer and other
     4  religious traditions and prohibiting any ceremony or speech
     5  mentioning God at the commencement exercises for the graduating
     6  students; and
     7     WHEREAS, These rulings could become a precedent for a
     8  systematic eradication of every trace of prayer and any mention
     9  of God at the graduation ceremonies of every public school in
    10  this Commonwealth; and
    11     WHEREAS, Robert Eldredge, President of the Downingtown Area
    12  School Board, offered a brief prayer thanking God during the
    13  course of his speech at the commencement exercises and for
    14  graduating seniors at the Downingtown Area Senior High School;
    15  and
    16     WHEREAS, The objecting students, through their ACLU
    17  attorneys, took the position that the school board president's
    18  personal religious thoughts, as expressed in his speech,
    19  violated the Federal court order, and filed contempt of court
    20  charges against Mr. Eldredge; and
    21     WHEREAS, This clear attempt to punish a speaker offering a
    22  brief prayer during a public school graduation ceremony has
    23  chilling implications for future speakers at commencement
    24  exercises throughout Pennsylvania, including valedictorians and
    25  other student speakers who will risk a lawsuit filed by the ACLU
    26  if they mention the name of God or express religious thought
    27  during their presentations; and
    28     WHEREAS, The United States Supreme Court, in Marsh v.
    29  Chambers, has upheld the right of legislative assemblies to open
    30  legislative days with prayers offered by chaplains paid for by
    19910H0028R0601                  - 2 -

     1  the State; and
     2     WHEREAS, The Supreme Court has declared, in this legislative
     3  context, that "the content of the prayer is not of concern to
     4  judges where, as here, there is no indication that the prayer
     5  opportunity has been exploited to proselytize or advance anyone,
     6  or to disparage any other faith or belief" and that under such
     7  circumstances it is not for the court "to embark on a sensitive
     8  evaluation or to parse the content of a particular prayer"; and
     9     WHEREAS, The practice of offering prayer and mentioning God
    10  at public school graduation ceremonies is similar in purpose and
    11  impact to the prayers offered at the beginning of the
    12  proceedings of legislative, judicial and other deliberative
    13  public bodies, including the House of Representatives of the
    14  Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, which opens its daily session day
    15  with a prayer offered by a member of the clergy; and
    16     WHEREAS, A fundamental distinction exists between prayer in
    17  connection with daily or routine school activities, which are
    18  more strongly imbued with the authority of the State, and prayer
    19  and the mention of God's name at special events such as
    20  commencement exercises, which are similar in nature to numerous
    21  other civil ceremonies, which are attended by the parents,
    22  relatives and friends of students and which are voluntary;
    23  therefore be it
    24     RESOLVED, That it is the concern of the House of
    25  Representatives that such sweeping court-imposed bans upon the
    26  expression of religious thought and upon the mention of God by
    27  commencement speakers during graduation ceremonies may
    28  inappropriately limit the free speech clause of the first
    29  amendment in order to inappropriately expand the establishment
    30  clause of the first amendment and may serve to create a
    19910H0028R0601                  - 3 -

     1  troublesome entanglement between free speech and religion; and
     2  be it further
     3     RESOLVED, That it is the view of the House of Representatives
     4  that reasonable prayer and the mention of God at commencement
     5  exercises are legitimate and appropriate parts of a ceremony
     6  commemorating an important event, as long as religious thoughts
     7  are not exploited to proselytize or to advance anyone or to
     8  disparage any other faith or belief; and be it further
     9     RESOLVED, That it is the view of the House of Representatives
    10  that an issue of such fundamental importance deserves to be
    11  carefully reviewed through a full hearing and appeal process.













    L17L82JS/19910H0028R0601         - 4 -