| |
|
| |
| THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| |
| HOUSE RESOLUTION |
|
| |
| |
| INTRODUCED BY CAUSER, GABLER, HUTCHINSON, BROOKS, CREIGHTON, GEIST, GILLESPIE, GINGRICH, GROVE, HORNAMAN, KAUFFMAN, MILLARD, MURT, PYLE, RAPP, ROAE AND SONNEY, MAY 11, 2011 |
| |
| |
| REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON CONSUMER AFFAIRS, MAY 11, 2011 |
| |
| |
| |
| A RESOLUTION |
| |
1 | Memorializing the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to |
2 | reconsider and reverse its December 17, 2010, Order directing |
3 | a split of the 814 area code in favor of an overlay. |
4 | WHEREAS, Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as |
5 | amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, gives the Federal |
6 | Communications Commission (FCC) exclusive jurisdiction over the |
7 | North American Numbering Plan and permits the FCC to delegate |
8 | that jurisdiction to State regulatory commissions; and |
9 | WHEREAS, The FCC recognized that state commissions are |
10 | uniquely positioned to understand local conditions and the |
11 | potential effects associated with area code and Numbering Plan |
12 | Area (NPA) implementation and thus has authorized states to |
13 | resolve matters involving the implementation of new area codes, |
14 | subject to FCC rules and guidelines governing the administration |
15 | of telephone numbers; and |
16 | WHEREAS, On June 2, 2009, Neustar, Inc., the North American |
17 | Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), in its capacity as the |
18 | neutral third party Numbering Plan Area Relief Planner for |
|
1 | Pennsylvania, filed a petition on behalf of the Pennsylvania |
2 | telecommunications industry with the Pennsylvania Public Utility |
3 | Commission (Commission) requesting approval of its plan for area |
4 | code relief in the 814 NPA; and |
5 | WHEREAS, On December 17, 2010, the Commission entered an |
6 | Order rejecting the NANPA relief recommendation and, instead, |
7 | directed that a geographic split of the 814 area code be |
8 | implemented within 22 months; and |
9 | WHEREAS, The Commission, in its Order, directed NANPA to |
10 | submit monthly updates on the projected exhaust date of the 814 |
11 | area code; and |
12 | WHEREAS, A monthly report submitted by NANPA, pursuant to the |
13 | Commission's Order, and released on January 2, 2011, shows that, |
14 | based upon historic code demand for the past 12 months, the 814 |
15 | area code may not exhaust until September 2031; and |
16 | WHEREAS, A semiannual Number Resource Utilization Forecast |
17 | (NRUF) report is scheduled to be released to the public in April |
18 | 2011 and may reflect a further extension of the projected area |
19 | code exhaust date; and |
20 | WHEREAS, The information contained in NANPA's monthly reports |
21 | to the Commission and the April 2011 NRUF report contain data |
22 | that was not available to be considered by the Commission in |
23 | making its December 17, 2010, Order; and |
24 | WHEREAS, More than 40 Petitions for Reconsideration have been |
25 | filed regarding the Commission's Order, including petitions by |
26 | several State legislators and local government officials; and |
27 | WHEREAS, If implemented, the split of the 814 area code |
28 | directed by the Commission's December 17, 2010, Order, would be |
29 | the first area code split, nationwide, in three years; and |
30 | WHEREAS, The directed split of the 814 area code would |
|
1 | require more than 1 million telephone customers in 11 counties |
2 | to change their 814 telephone numbers to 582 numbers; and |
3 | WHEREAS, An area code overlay would enable all existing |
4 | customers to keep their current telephone numbers and only new |
5 | lines would be assigned a new area code, after all numbers in |
6 | the 814 area code are exhausted; and |
7 | WHEREAS, Implementation of an overlay presents fewer |
8 | inconveniences to residents and businesses in the 814 area code |
9 | in that current telephone line subscribers will avoid the costs |
10 | of having to change their telephone numbers, such as: notifying |
11 | friends, family and business contacts of the new number, |
12 | updating letterhead and business cards, changing directories and |
13 | numbers programmed into wireless phones and speed dials; |
14 | therefore be it |
15 | RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives memorialize the |
16 | Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to reconsider and reverse |
17 | its December 17, 2010, Order directing a split of the 814 area |
18 | code in favor of an area code overlay; and be it further |
19 | RESOLVED, That copies of this resolution be transmitted to |
20 | the Chairman and Commissioners of the Public Utility Commission. |
|