See other bills
under the
same topic
                                                       PRINTER'S NO. 673

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA


SENATE BILL

No. 619 Session of 2007


        INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, COSTA, BROWNE, STACK, O'PAKE, ERICKSON
           AND WASHINGTON, MARCH 21, 2007

        REFERRED TO JUDICIARY, MARCH 21, 2007

                                     AN ACT

     1  Amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the
     2     Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, providing for permissible
     3     argument as to damages at trial.

     4     The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
     5  hereby enacts as follows:
     6     Section 1.  Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated
     7  Statutes is amended by adding a section to read:
     8  § 8320.1.  Permissible argument as to damages at trial.
     9     (a)  General rule.--Except as provided in subsection (b), in
    10  any civil action tried before a judge, jury or other tribunal,
    11  an attorney during closing argument:
    12         (1)  May specifically argue to the judge, jury or other
    13     tribunal in lump sums or by mathematical formulae the amount
    14     the attorney deems to be an appropriate award for all past
    15     and future economic or noneconomic damages or both economic
    16     and noneconomic damages claimed to be recoverable.
    17         (2)  May, on behalf of a defendant, argue to the judge,
    18     jury or other tribunal that an award of zero damages is

     1     appropriate, even if there is a finding of liability against
     2     the defendant.
     3     (b)  Prior disclosure required.--No party may argue a
     4  specific sum as provided in subsection (a) unless the party
     5  first discloses to the court and opposing counsel that the party
     6  intends to argue the specific damages listed in subsection (a)
     7  prior to the presentation of closing arguments.
     8     (c)  Jury instruction.--Whenever, in a civil action tried
     9  before a jury, specific lump sums or mathematical formulae are
    10  argued during closing arguments as provided for in subsection
    11  (a), the trial court shall instruct the jury that the sums or
    12  mathematical formulae argued are not evidence but only arguments
    13  and that the determination of the amount of appropriate damages
    14  to be awarded, if any, is solely for the jury's determination.
    15     (d)  Construction.--
    16         (1)  Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to
    17     prevent a defendant from arguing in any case that the facts
    18     and evidence support a finding of no liability.
    19         (2)  Notwithstanding subsection (b), arguments as to
    20     appropriate amount of economic damages may be made without
    21     notice to opposing counsel if evidence supporting economic
    22     damages has been introduced at trial.
    23     Section 2.  This act shall take effect in 60 days.





    A19L42DMS/20070S0619B0673        - 2 -