See other bills
under the
same topic
                                                      PRINTER'S NO. 2834

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA


HOUSE RESOLUTION

No. 506 Session of 2007


        INTRODUCED BY GEORGE, ARGALL, BELFANTI, BENNINGTON, BRENNAN,
           CALTAGIRONE, COHEN, GIBBONS, GOODMAN, GRUCELA, HARHAI,
           HARKINS, HERSHEY, JOSEPHS, W. KELLER, MAHONEY, MANDERINO,
           MELIO, MUNDY, MYERS, M. O'BRIEN, PARKER, PETRARCA, PETRONE,
           RUBLEY, SCHRODER, SHIMKUS, K. SMITH, SOLOBAY, SURRA,
           TANGRETTI, J. TAYLOR, WALKO, WOJNAROSKI, YOUNGBLOOD AND
           YUDICHAK, NOVEMBER 14, 2007

        REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY,
           NOVEMBER 14, 2007

                                  A RESOLUTION

     1  Urging the Department of Environmental Protection and the
     2     Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to exercise due
     3     diligence on behalf of the Commonwealth's energy consumers by
     4     identifying and evaluating measures taken in other states to
     5     manage the transition from electricity rate caps to no rate
     6     caps and minimize its impact upon the individual residential
     7     consumer, to make written suggestions on how certain laws may
     8     be changed to reduce the incidence of rate shock and the
     9     impact of rate shock and to submit the suggestions to the
    10     Chief Clerk for distribution among members of the House of
    11     Representatives.

    12     WHEREAS, More than ten years ago, several commissioners of
    13  the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission actively lobbied
    14  members of the House of Representatives to vote for electricity
    15  deregulation; and
    16     WHEREAS, Desiring to foster competition among utility
    17  providers and expand consumer choice, the Commonwealth
    18  deregulated the electricity industry in December 1996; and
    19     WHEREAS, To date, not only has commercial and residential


     1  competition not taken place, it is highly unlikely that market
     2  forces will ever be such that competition manifests itself in
     3  the near future; and
     4     WHEREAS, According to the chairman of the commission's recent
     5  testimony, the commission's preferred approach to handling
     6  energy costs when rate caps expire is to allow the various
     7  utilities to obtain energy at the "prevailing market rates"; and
     8     WHEREAS, This profit-maximizing, free-market approach has
     9  already resulted in up to 70% rate increases in some states and
    10  even higher rate increases for smaller utilities in this
    11  Commonwealth; and
    12     WHEREAS, Commissioners have been quoted in the press stating,
    13  ostensibly, that their hands are tied, and therefore, they will
    14  be unable to exact much change in the commission's future
    15  actions when rate caps lapse in 2009 and 2010 because they will
    16  simply be carrying out the intent of the General Assembly
    17  through the Electricity Generation Customer Choice and
    18  Competition Act; and
    19     WHEREAS, In her testimony on October 3, 2007, to the House
    20  Committee on Environmental Resources and Energy, the Secretary
    21  of Environmental Protection stated that in Pike County there was
    22  a 130% increase in electricity costs overnight when their rate
    23  caps expired; and
    24     WHEREAS, Looking outside of this Commonwealth to the
    25  neighboring states of Delaware and Maryland, the price of their
    26  electricity increased 59% and 72%, respectively, when their rate
    27  caps expired recently; and
    28     WHEREAS, When electricity rate caps expire in 2009 and 2010,
    29  the citizens of this Commonwealth are sure to fall victim to the
    30  crippling rate hikes that will inevitably result; and
    20070H0506R2834                  - 2 -     

     1     WHEREAS, As the Secretary of Environmental Protection has
     2  said, "The clock is now ticking very loudly"; and
     3     WHEREAS, Other states have started to address this impending
     4  crisis, and it is time that Pennsylvania take similar action;
     5  and
     6     WHEREAS, Much to the dismay of consumers in this
     7  Commonwealth, the commission seems to be ignoring the current
     8  national trend in state legislatures against deregulation; and
     9     WHEREAS, The commissioners have failed to provide
    10  constructive comments to the General Assembly on how to combat
    11  impending rate hikes and the inevitable financial and economic
    12  disruption that will result; therefore be it
    13     RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives urge the
    14  Department of Environmental Protection and the Pennsylvania
    15  Public Utility Commission to exercise due diligence on behalf of
    16  this Commonwealth's energy consumers by identifying and
    17  evaluating measures taken in other states to manage the
    18  transition from electricity rate caps to no rate caps and
    19  minimize its impact upon the individual residential consumer, to
    20  make written suggestions on how certain laws may be changed to
    21  reduce the incidence of rate shock and the impact of rate shock
    22  and to submit the suggestions to the Chief Clerk for
    23  distribution among members of the House of Representatives.





    K2L82DMS/20070H0506R2834         - 3 -