See other bills
under the
same topic
                                                      PRINTER'S NO. 2746

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA


HOUSE RESOLUTION

No. 323 Session of 1999


        INTRODUCED BY MARSICO AND RAYMOND, DECEMBER 7, 1999

        REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON RULES, DECEMBER 7, 1999

                                  A RESOLUTION

     1  Amending House Resolution No. 251, adopted November 15, 1999,
     2     entitled "A resolution calling for a cost and services study
     3     of the county adult probation system by the Legislative
     4     Budget and Finance Committee," by extending the due date of
     5     the report.

     6     RESOLVED, That House Resolution No. 251, adopted November 15,
     7  1999, be amended to read:
     8                            A RESOLUTION
     9  Calling for a cost and services study of the county adult
    10     probation system by the Legislative Budget and Finance
    11     Committee.
    12     WHEREAS, County adult probation departments fill a critical
    13  need in this Commonwealth's criminal justice system; and
    14     WHEREAS, The average Statewide caseload for each county adult
    15  probation officer is 160 active files, with significant
    16  increases in the numbers of felony offenders and convicted sex
    17  offenders under their supervision; and
    18     WHEREAS, County adult probation and parole agencies provide
    19  over 1,000 services and programs to the county court and

     1  corrections system, ranging from investigative services to
     2  supervisory functions; and
     3     WHEREAS, Since 1991, county adult probation has responded to
     4  the number and type of offenders placed under supervision by
     5  increasing specialized offender programs such as sex offender
     6  and mental health/mental retardation programs, electronic
     7  monitoring and intensive supervision; and
     8     WHEREAS, The Improvement of Probation Services Act of 1965
     9  requires an 80% reimbursement for the salaries of county adult
    10  probation officers complying with State requirements; and
    11     WHEREAS, Two hundred sixty-eight adult probation officers
    12  have been hired since 1991 to meet the increased demands of the
    13  system, but these qualified probation officers are not included
    14  under the current funding formula because the grant-in-aid
    15  eligible positions have been capped by administrative order; and
    16     WHEREAS, More than 95% of all county probation officers have,
    17  at minimum, a bachelor's degree, but the average starting salary
    18  remains far below that of the Pennsylvania State Police and
    19  State parole agents; therefore be it
    20     RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives call for the
    21  Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to study the county
    22  adult probation system and specifically the grant-in-aid
    23  formula, county costs and supervision fees to determine the
    24  impact on the quality and level of program services offered
    25  through the county adult probation system; and be it further
    26     RESOLVED, That the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee
    27  report its findings to the House of Representatives by [January
    28  30, 2000] October 31, 2000.


    L1L82JAM/19990H0323R2746         - 2 -